Skip to content

Conversation

Ang-m4
Copy link

@Ang-m4 Ang-m4 commented Apr 1, 2025

Language Management Module

Description

This PR intents to add a new LanguageManager module to standardize language switching functionality. The module provides a new API for handling language changes from any component in the application.

Key Features

  • Unified Language Management: Centralizes all language-related operations into a single module
  • Complete Language Switching Flow: Handles the entire language change process through a single function call
  • User Preference Persistence: Updates both client-side cookies and server-side user preferences
  • Session Management: Integrates with LMS backend to ensure consistent language experience
  • RTL Support: Automatically handles right-to-left language adjustments
  • Event System Integration: Publishes events when locale changes to allow components to react

Implementation Details

New Functions

  • changeUserSessionLanguage(languageCode): Main public function that orchestrates the language change process:

    • Sets the language cookie
    • Updates authenticated user preferences in the backend (if applicable)
    • Updates the session language
    • Publishes a locale change event
    • Handles RTL adjustments
  • updateUserPreferences(username, preferenceData): Updates server-side user language preferences via the API

  • setSessionLanguage(languageCode): Sets the language for the current session using the LMS setlang endpoint

API Usage

Components can now implement language switching with a single function call:

import { changeUserSessionLanguage } from '@edx/frontend-platform/i18n';

// When a user selects a new language
changeUserSessionLanguage('ar'); // Switch to Arabic

Related Work

This functionality is a core dependency for the Language Selector Implementation.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Apr 1, 2025
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

openedx-webhooks commented Apr 1, 2025

Thanks for the pull request, @Ang-m4!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/committers-frontend.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.


Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Triage in Contributions Apr 1, 2025
@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 moved this from Needs Triage to Waiting on Author in Contributions Apr 1, 2025
@Ang-m4 Ang-m4 force-pushed the afg/change-user-language-preference branch from c87194b to a17955e Compare April 2, 2025 14:08
@Ang-m4 Ang-m4 marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2025 13:04
@dcoa dcoa requested a review from arbrandes May 29, 2025 19:51
Copy link
Contributor

@arbrandes arbrandes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is a good idea to have this logic be centralized in frontend-platform, instead of implemented as part of language selection dropdowns. I imagine openedx/frontend-component-footer#493 will have to be refactored accordingly, correct?

I have a minor suggested change, but I'm also not approving yet as I'd like to see PRs that use this.

@dcoa
Copy link
Contributor

dcoa commented Jun 13, 2025

I was thinking about the list of supported languages to display

I'm thinking as default use an array provided for frontend-platform using the messages object here that is configured during the MFE initialize. So the manager could return a function or variable with the list of locales Object.keys(messages)

@arbrandes what do you thing?

In that way we can get rid of SITE_SUPPORTED_LANGUAGES here, and in any case someone want to pass a more restricted or controlled list, they can do it by the plugin configuration.

@Ang-m4 Ang-m4 force-pushed the afg/change-user-language-preference branch from 1e1f82c to d83e228 Compare June 18, 2025 19:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.42857% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 87.31%. Comparing base (acf0d46) to head (729b314).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/i18n/lib.js 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #786      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.13%   87.31%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files          48       50       +2     
  Lines        1407     1435      +28     
  Branches      297      305       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         1226     1253      +27     
- Misses        168      169       +1     
  Partials       13       13              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('language', languageCode);

const url = `${getConfig().LMS_BASE_URL}/i18n/setlang/`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was digging a little bit in edx-platform to see how the mako templates manage the logic and I found this endpoint, it is used for update no-authenticated users as you can see in the mako template.

The endpoint request a CSRF token as you can see here. I just want to make sure the following line of code is correct as a suggested change from the frontend-platform perspective (getAuthenticatedHttpClient is the right service to use? -@arbrandes could you help me with this doubt?-).

getAuthenticatedHttpClient().patch(`${getConfig().LMS_BASE_URL}/lang_pref/update_language`, {"pref-lang": languageCode}, { isPublic: true })

In this way we can avoid setting the language cookie (as currently happen with the lines 81-83 of the this PR), and it will be 100% managed for the backend in both authenticated and unauthenticated users.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I create a sandbox for testing in learning, and the current endpoint can manage the authenticated and unauthenticated case (I have the problem in my dev environment only)

https://app.pr-1741-1395ab.sandboxes.opencraft.hosting/learning/course/course-v1:Demo+CT01+CT01/home

c.c @arbrandes

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dcoa, you say the endpoint can manage both authenticated and unauthenticated cases, but then mention a problem. Do you still think we can use the update_language endpoint here instead of Django's setlang?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I update my environment and tested it again and the /i18n/setlang/ endpoint works with the authenticated and unauthenticated users in both production like and dev environments.

So we can set the language using it and make the backend handle the cookie update. For the unauthenticated user will create a session cookie meanwhile for a authenticated user creates a cookie with expiration date.

Then the change is not needed.

@Ang-m4
Copy link
Author

Ang-m4 commented Jun 25, 2025

Hi @arbrandes,

I made some changes to the code as you requested. Please let me know what you think:

  • Created a new languageApi module for easier testing.
  • Added an optional flag for reloading the page if needed.
  • Added a unit test.

and i would like to know your thoughts on @dcoa’s comments!

The endpoint request a CSRF token as you can see here. I just want to make sure the following line of code is correct as a suggested change from the frontend-platform perspective (getAuthenticatedHttpClient is the right service to use? -@arbrandes could you help me with this doubt?-).


I'm thinking as default use an array provided for frontend-platform using the messages object here that is configured during the MFE initialize. So the manager could return a function or variable with the list of locales Object.keys(messages)

Thank you so much for your time on this!

@dcoa
Copy link
Contributor

dcoa commented Aug 25, 2025

@arbrandes friendly tag for reviewing here. Thank you!

@felipemontoya
Copy link
Member

@arbrandes friendly ping again. To not be a constant bother since I know you are deepdiving in the frontendbase stuff, I'd like to ask if you need to pass this to someone else to be a reviewer here.

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 moved this from Waiting on Author to Ready for Review in Contributions Sep 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@arbrandes arbrandes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of changes requested, and one pending change based on @dcoa's findings.

As for the list of supported languages, I completely agree that the list should come from the messages array, which can itself be changed by operators by other mechanisms. And it's also a good idea to have a getter function provided by i18n/lib.

Otherwise, this is looking good. Apologies for the delay in getting to the review!

cookies.set(cookieName, languageCode);

try {
const user = getAuthenticatedUser();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe the call to getAuthenticatedUser() would be more at home in languageApi.js. username is only used there, anyway.

* @returns {Promise} - A promise that resolves when the API call completes successfully,
* or rejects if there's an error with the request.
*/
export async function updateUserPreferences(username, preferenceData) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As suggested in another review comment, I would change this function like so:

Suggested change
export async function updateUserPreferences(username, preferenceData) {
export async function updateAuthenticatedUserPreferences(preferenceData) {

And then get the authenticated username inside the function. Unless, of course, you can imagine a situation where we'd need this function to change the preference of some user other than the currently logged in one - but I find that to be unlikely.

formData.append('language', languageCode);

return getAuthenticatedHttpClient().post(
`${getConfig().LMS_BASE_URL}/i18n/setlang/`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm adding a "pending" note here regarding @dcoa's findings on this other conversation. If the update_language endpoint works, we should probably use it.

Comment on lines 27 to 28
const cookies = getCookies();
const cookieName = getConfig().LANGUAGE_PREFERENCE_COOKIE_NAME;
cookies.set(cookieName, languageCode);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As per this other conversation, if we can leverage the update_language endpoint to set the cookie, we should. This is an if, though.

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('language', languageCode);

const url = `${getConfig().LMS_BASE_URL}/i18n/setlang/`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dcoa, you say the endpoint can manage both authenticated and unauthenticated cases, but then mention a problem. Do you still think we can use the update_language endpoint here instead of Django's setlang?

@Ang-m4 Ang-m4 force-pushed the afg/change-user-language-preference branch from c2d269c to 133b230 Compare October 6, 2025 01:57
@dcoa
Copy link
Contributor

dcoa commented Oct 8, 2025

This LGTM!! thank you, @Ang-m4 .

@arbrandes the PR was updated accordingly to the feedback, could you please verify?

@dcoa dcoa requested a review from arbrandes October 8, 2025 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: Ready for Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants