Use squared symbol for specialization #11
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files. Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR revises one symbol used in the figures, and regenerates the figures.
⊂was being used to representrdfs:subClassOf, but is visually close to∈being used forrdf:type. This impacts use of this script for describing meta-classes (i.e., classes whose members are classes, one possible resolution of UCO Issue 595).⊏offers a little more visual distinction from∈, and seems sufficiently expandable to also represent specialization of properties (i.e., would be suitable forrdfs:subClassOfandrdfs:subPropertyOf).