refactor: Avoid using reflection to manage AppiumCommandExecutor state
#2356
+3
−29
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
valfirst
requested review from
mykola-mokhnach,
SrinivasanTarget and
saikrishna321
as code owners
SrinivasanTarget
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2025
mykola-mokhnach
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change list
Use regular fields instead of refelction.
Types of changes
What types of changes are you proposing/introducing to Java client?
Put an
xin the boxes that applyDetails
SeleniumHQ/selenium#16181 is fixed and released, now the fields are
protectedand accessible in child classes.