-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
Refactor Rtde client test #389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #389 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 77.94% 77.53% -0.41%
==========================================
Files 92 92
Lines 4199 4207 +8
Branches 465 467 +2
==========================================
- Hits 3273 3262 -11
- Misses 684 703 +19
Partials 242 242
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Compares the online documentation fields to the list generated from the dict in the repo. Does not actually interact with RTDE, so should be robot-version agnostic.
4615f6c
to
905d5fe
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good, thank you!
The exhaustive rtde output recipe is now generated at build time, and the test will fail if the controller does not know all fields. The test will also fail if using the wrong ursim version