-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
Description
Hello,
I've been primarily using Abricate with the VFDB database and have encountered a couple of issues that I hope can be addressed.
-
I noticed that Abricate utilizes the VFDB's setA (core dataset) for its database. Attempting to create a custom database using setB (all dataset) from VFDB, I've run into a problem. While Abricate neatly extracts and organizes gene names in its output, the VFDB database format combines gene names with additional information, such as "VFG032131(gb|WP_009917653) (actA) actin-assembly inducing protein precursor [ActA (VF0066) - Motility (VFC0204)] [Listeria monocytogenes SLCC2540]", making it difficult to separately identify gene names. How does Abricate manage to extract gene names separately when using its default database?
-
For certain samples, specific genes are not detected by Abricate, yet when I submit the same samples directly to the VFDB site, those genes are identified. What could be causing this discrepancy?
Thank you for your assistance in resolving these matters. I look forward to your guidance and suggestions.